Fighting terror with error: the counter-productive regulation of informal value transfers
This paper challenges the widely shared view that the United States and international frameworks regulating terrorist finance and money laundering (AML/CFT) is productive and effective. Through a careful look at the evidence regarding the formal and informal fund transfer systems, this paper shows t...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2006
|
| In: |
Crime, law and social change
Jahr: 2006, Band: 45, Heft: 4/5, Seiten: 315-336 |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Schlagwörter: |
| Zusammenfassung: | This paper challenges the widely shared view that the United States and international frameworks regulating terrorist finance and money laundering (AML/CFT) is productive and effective. Through a careful look at the evidence regarding the formal and informal fund transfer systems, this paper shows that security, crime control and economic policy objectives are systematically frustrated by ill-conceived and misapplied rules. US federal and state regulations in particular illustrate how unrealistic, unaffordable and counter-productive are current arrangements. The paper concludes with some suggestions about how to reverse the ongoing fact-free policy making process. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-0751 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10611-006-9041-5 |
