Fighting terror with error: the counter-productive regulation of informal value transfers
This paper challenges the widely shared view that the United States and international frameworks regulating terrorist finance and money laundering (AML/CFT) is productive and effective. Through a careful look at the evidence regarding the formal and informal fund transfer systems, this paper shows t...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2006
|
| En: |
Crime, law and social change
Año: 2006, Volumen: 45, Número: 4/5, Páginas: 315-336 |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Palabras clave: |
| Sumario: | This paper challenges the widely shared view that the United States and international frameworks regulating terrorist finance and money laundering (AML/CFT) is productive and effective. Through a careful look at the evidence regarding the formal and informal fund transfer systems, this paper shows that security, crime control and economic policy objectives are systematically frustrated by ill-conceived and misapplied rules. US federal and state regulations in particular illustrate how unrealistic, unaffordable and counter-productive are current arrangements. The paper concludes with some suggestions about how to reverse the ongoing fact-free policy making process. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1573-0751 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10611-006-9041-5 |
