Interpretation of the prohibition of torture: making sense of 'dignity' talk
The right not to be subjected to torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment is invariably associated with ‘human dignity’. The idea of dignity plays some role in this right’s interpretation, although the content of the idea in this context, as in others, is unclear. Making sense of...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2016
|
| En: |
Human rights review
Año: 2016, Volumen: 17, Número: 3, Páginas: 371-390 |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Palabras clave: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 867132051 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250821100543.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 160908s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12142-016-0405-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)867132051 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)986713205X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBV867132051 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Webster, Elaine |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)116169806X |0 (DE-627)1025170229 |0 (DE-576)506824950 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Webster, Elaine | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Interpretation of the prohibition of torture |b making sense of 'dignity' talk |c Elaine Webster |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 387-390 | ||
| 520 | |a The right not to be subjected to torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment is invariably associated with ‘human dignity’. The idea of dignity plays some role in this right’s interpretation, although the content of the idea in this context, as in others, is unclear. Making sense of the dignity idea involves a number of challenges. These challenges give rise to the methodological-type question at the heart of this article: how should human rights lawyers go about articulating the content of ‘dignity’? The article proposes, and models, a methodological approach in response. Its core argument is that human rights law needs the vocabulary provided by theorizations of dignity but that these theorizations should be anchored in authoritative human rights jurisprudence. It argues that this approach can help make sense of the dignity idea in a way that facilitates a richer understanding of its influence on interpretation. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Dignity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Torture | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Inhuman treatment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Degrading treatment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Interpretation | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Human rights review |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1999 |g 17(2016), 3, Seite 371-390 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320607771 |w (DE-600)2020969-1 |w (DE-576)109633938 |x 1874-6306 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:2016 |g number:3 |g pages:371-390 |
| 856 | |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12142-016-0405-7.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [deprecated] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-016-0405-7 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12142-016-0405-7 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4771190119 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 867132051 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250912124535 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250912||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||
