The priority of legitmacy in times of political transition

This paper interprets the relation between justice and legitimacy found in John Rawls's Political Liberalism and then applies it to the field of transitional justice. The author argues that transitional mechanisms can be better defended in terms of “legitimacy” than in “justice,” because the ci...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Buckley, Michael (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2013
En: Human rights review
Año: 2013, Volumen: 14, Número: 4, Páginas: 327-345
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 783735928
003 DE-627
005 20250811085850.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 140424s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s12142-013-0276-0  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)783735928 
035 |a (DE-576)9783735926 
035 |a (DE-599)GBV783735928 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Buckley, Michael  |0 (DE-588)136874010  |0 (DE-627)58757397X  |0 (DE-576)301320306  |4 aut 
109 |a Buckley, Michael 
245 1 4 |a The priority of legitmacy in times of political transition  |c Michael Buckley 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 343-345 
520 |a This paper interprets the relation between justice and legitimacy found in John Rawls's Political Liberalism and then applies it to the field of transitional justice. The author argues that transitional mechanisms can be better defended in terms of “legitimacy” than in “justice,” because the circumstances of transitional justice admit of reasonable disagreement over “just” public policy. In such circumstances, policy recommendations can always be construed as falling short of justice, thus raising plausible concerns over their normative justification. This paper attempts to answer such concerns by justifying transitional mechanisms as morally appropriate yet less than fully just. The author explains how the concept of legitimacy facilitates such a justification and how such a justification can secure the normative grounds that are ironically threatened by investigations relying on a concept of justice. 
650 4 |a Legitimacy 
650 4 |a Transitional Justice 
650 4 |a John Rawls 
650 4 |a Political Liberalism 
650 4 |a Justification 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Human rights review  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1999  |g 14(2013), 4, Seite 327-345  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320607771  |w (DE-600)2020969-1  |w (DE-576)109633938  |x 1874-6306  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:2013  |g number:4  |g pages:327-345 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-013-0276-0  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12142-013-0276-0  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 477118612X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 783735928 
LOK |0 005 20250912123305 
LOK |0 008 250912||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw