Cheating in Iran: An Examination of Academic Dishonesty Through the Lens of Situational Action Theory

Academic dishonesty has recently attracted the attention of scholars worldwide in the aftermath of severe breaches of academic rules of conduct. As today's students are tomorrow's leading academics and professionals, it continues to be of importance to understand the basic explanatory mech...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
VerfasserInnen: Shadmanfaat, Seyyedeh Masoomeh (Shamila) (VerfasserIn) ; Kabiri, Saeed (VerfasserIn) ; Donner, Christopher M. (VerfasserIn) ; Rahmati, Mohammad M. (VerfasserIn) ; Maddahi, Javad (VerfasserIn) ; Yousefvand, Saman (VerfasserIn) ; Hardyns, Wim (VerfasserIn) ; Safiri, Khadijeh (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2025
In: International criminal justice review
Jahr: 2025, Band: 35, Heft: 4, Seiten: 393-415
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:
Deterrence
Self-control
Morality
Academic Dishonesty
Situational Action Theory
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Academic dishonesty has recently attracted the attention of scholars worldwide in the aftermath of severe breaches of academic rules of conduct. As today's students are tomorrow's leading academics and professionals, it continues to be of importance to understand the basic explanatory mechanisms of academic dishonesty. The present cross-cultural inquiry explores academic dishonesty through the lens of situational action theory (SAT). Specifically, this paper explores the connection between criminogenic propensity and criminogenic exposure, and its impact on academic misconduct. We analyze self-reported data from a random sample of 378 Iranian students. Multivariate regression results, examining both direct and interactional relationships, demonstrate that the key propensity–environment hypotheses of SAT are generally supported as morality, self-control, and perceived deterrence all play a role in explaining academic misconduct. Specific findings, study limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.
ISSN:1556-3855
DOI:10.1177/10575677241271201