Constructing a feminist desistance: resisting responsibilization
Criminology’s focus on desistance theory is illustrative of its phallocentric occupation. This chapter considers the implications of this wilful acceptance in criminal justice policy and practice on the experiences of criminalized women while considering an alternative anti-carceral, intersectional...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2024
|
| In: |
Feminist responses to injustices of the state and its institutions
Year: 2024, Pages: 161-179 |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1924965941 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250507133415.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 250507s2024 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 020 | |a 9781529207293 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1924965941 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1924965941 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Barr, Úna |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1189440903 |0 (DE-627)1668084538 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Barr, Úna | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Constructing a feminist desistance: resisting responsibilization |c Úna Barr and Emily Luise Hart |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 175-179 | ||
| 520 | |a Criminology’s focus on desistance theory is illustrative of its phallocentric occupation. This chapter considers the implications of this wilful acceptance in criminal justice policy and practice on the experiences of criminalized women while considering an alternative anti-carceral, intersectional feminist way forward. First, the drive of desistance praxis which has perpetually encouraged criminalized women to (re)enter and engage with ‘conventional society’ and develop and maintain social bonds that will support desistance trajectories is critiqued. It is argued that ‘re/integration’ is often not possible, nor desired. Second, it is contended that a concentration on agentic, individualized desistance, as well as uncritical promotion of relational desistance, has resulted in state support for responsiblized criminalized individuals making changes to their own lives, in the absence of robust structural support mechanisms. Finally, it is outlined how the bulk of desistance literature has not critiqued the role of the prison, nor the wider aspects of the criminal justice system in creating social harm, beyond contributing to, or standing as a barrier to, desistance from crime. The chapter is concluded by putting forward a vision for anti-carceral, intersectional feminist desistance research, theory, policy and practice. | ||
| 700 | 1 | |a Hart, Emily Luise |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1138852791 |0 (DE-627)896772322 |0 (DE-576)48833411X |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Feminist responses to injustices of the state and its institutions |d Bristol : Bristol University Press, 2024 |g (2024), Seite 161-179 |h x, 267 Seiten |w (DE-627)1907953388 |z 9781529207293 |z 9781529207286 |7 nnam |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2024 |g pages:161-179 |
| 776 | 1 | |o 10.51952/9781529207316.ch008 | |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4722019266 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1924965941 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250507133415 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250507||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| ORI | |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||