Parole as resentencing: Exploring the punitive accounts of parole decision-making through the comparative case study of Israel
Parole boards have traditionally assessed prisoners? future risk and rehabilitation prospects in deciding on early release from prison. However, parole boards may do more. In some systems, they may deny parole applications for punitive reasons, thus acting as a resentencing authority. This study con...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2023
|
| In: |
European journal of criminology
Year: 2023, Volume: 20, Issue: 4, Pages: 1231-1250 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1894805267 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20241213142747.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240709s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/14773708211039635 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1894805267 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1894805267 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dagan, Netanel |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1312390484 |0 (DE-627)187214702X |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Dagan, Netanel | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Parole as resentencing: Exploring the punitive accounts of parole decision-making through the comparative case study of Israel |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Parole boards have traditionally assessed prisoners? future risk and rehabilitation prospects in deciding on early release from prison. However, parole boards may do more. In some systems, they may deny parole applications for punitive reasons, thus acting as a resentencing authority. This study conducted a qualitative analysis of the punitive discourses of parole decision-making, with Israel as a comparative case study. Through interviews with 20 chairpersons of Israeli Parole Boards, we found three themes of punitive parole decision-making: (a) preserving public confidence in the criminal justice system; (b) preserving penal proportionality; and (c) re-censuring an especially depraved moral character. The findings suggested that parole boards? punitive discretion is multidimensional and complex. Such punitive discretion may be openly implemented, it may be cloaked as risk assessment, or decided without formal recognition. The findings further indicated that resentencing through discretionary parole may not only conflict with rehabilitation and risk aims, but may also raise challenges for retributive and deterrent penal policy. Implications for comparative parole policy are discussed. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Deterrence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Discretion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Parole | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public confidence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Public Opinion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a resentencing | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Retribution | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal of criminology |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2004 |g 20(2023), 4, Seite 1231-1250 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)379048256 |w (DE-600)2135314-1 |w (DE-576)112775543 |x 1741-2609 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2023 |g number:4 |g pages:1231-1250 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211039635 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 454851130X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1894805267 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240912065439 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240709||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||