Delimiting community: examining the punitive implications of reformist and abolitionist discourse encoding an ‘us-them’ binary
Within reformist and abolitionist discourse on punishment, the articulation of community delimits those who can be considered a part of collective life and those who, having offended collective sentiments, are to be positioned outside the collective. By positing community at a moment of exclusion, t...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2023
|
| In: |
Contemporary justice review
Year: 2023, Volume: 26, Issue: 4, Pages: 376–392 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
| Summary: | Within reformist and abolitionist discourse on punishment, the articulation of community delimits those who can be considered a part of collective life and those who, having offended collective sentiments, are to be positioned outside the collective. By positing community at a moment of exclusion, this discourse superimposes a villain at the discursive level. This article critiques the punitive implications of delimiting community, most notably: taking for granted the dangerous few and maintaining the tenability of punitive intervention. A discourse analysis of four dominant reformist and abolitionist theorizations reveals an us-them binary across their interpretations of punitive interventions. Our discussion explores the paradox of supposing social cohesion within an exclusionary framework and considers the possibility of imagining a non-punitive discourse. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-2248 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/10282580.2024.2330369 |
