Supporting Women and Children Returning from Violent Extremist Contexts: Proposing a 5R Framework to Inform Program and Policy Development

Women and children returning from areas formerly controlled by the Islamic State typically have experienced high levels of trauma and indoctrination, further complicating politically fraught efforts at reintegration and resettlement. Consequently, countries around the world are grappling with how be...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ellis, Beverley Heidi 1972- (Autor)
Otros Autores: King, Michael ; Cardeli, Emma ; Christopher, Enryka ; Davis, Seetha ; Yohannes, Sewit ; Bunn, Mary ; McCoy, John ; Weine, Stevan
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2024
En: Terrorism and political violence
Año: 2024, Volumen: 36, Número: 4, Páginas: 425–454
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
Descripción
Sumario:Women and children returning from areas formerly controlled by the Islamic State typically have experienced high levels of trauma and indoctrination, further complicating politically fraught efforts at reintegration and resettlement. Consequently, countries around the world are grappling with how best to manage the return of these women and children. To help better understand which types of programming can contribute to the successful, non-violent reintegration of these individuals, we incorporated ideas from existing Repatriation and Rehabilitation (R&R) literature, field practitioners, R&R subject matter experts, and literature from adjacent fields (e.g., refugee resettlement, criminal justice, psychological resilience) into a recommended best practice approach to supporting returning women and children. We propose a shift from “R&R” programming to what we call the “5R” framework: Repatriation/Resettlement, Reintegration, Rehabilitation, and Resilience. This shift provides conceptual clarity related to how different program elements target proximal goals (e.g., wellbeing and personal safety, belonging and opportunity, non-violence, and dignity), and how programming can shift from more centrally- and government-held services to informal and community-based supports.
ISSN:1556-1836
DOI:10.1080/09546553.2023.2169142