Racial and ethnic differences in the predictive validity of the level of service inventory-revised among prison inmates

The Level of Service Inventory?Revised (LSI-R) is a risk/needs assessment tool that is widely used in correctional settings. Extant research has demonstrated the predictive validity of the LSI-R for individuals under correctional supervision. Yet, few researchers have assessed whether the LSI-R and...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Chenane, Joselyne L. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Brennan, Pauline Katherine 1967- ; Steiner, Benjamin 1975-2019 ; Ellison, Jared M.
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2015
En: Criminal justice and behavior
Año: 2015, Volumen: 42, Número: 3, Páginas: 286-303
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
LSI-R
Inmates
Predictive Validity
Prison misconduct
Race/ethnicity
Risk assessment
Descripción
Sumario:The Level of Service Inventory?Revised (LSI-R) is a risk/needs assessment tool that is widely used in correctional settings. Extant research has demonstrated the predictive validity of the LSI-R for individuals under correctional supervision. Yet, few researchers have assessed whether the LSI-R and its various subcomponents predict prison misconduct similarly for White versus non-White inmates. Using data collected from male inmates confined in prisons across a Midwestern state, we examined the predictive validity of the LSI-R and its 10 subcomponents for White, Black, and Hispanic inmates. We found that the LSI-R predicted the prevalence of misconduct for inmates of varying races/ethnicities. However, we reached a different conclusion when we examined the incidence of misconduct; the LSI-R composite score and subcomponent scores showed greater predictive utility for White inmates than for non-White inmates. Our findings add to a growing body of research that suggests that the predictive validity of the LSI-R differs by offender race/ethnicity. We discuss the policy implications of our findings and offer recommendations for future research.
ISSN:1552-3594
DOI:10.1177/0093854814548195