An Assessment of the Cues College Students Interpret From a Sexual Partner to Determine They Are Refusing

The purpose of this study was to assess the cues college students use to determine a sexual partner is refusing vaginal-penile sex (i.e., refusal interpretations). As a secondary aim, we explored the influence of item wording (not willing/non-consent vs refusal) on college students? self-reported re...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marcantonio, Tiffany L. (Author)
Contributors: Valdez, Danny ; Jozkowski, Kristen N.
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
In: Journal of interpersonal violence
Year: 2022, Volume: 37, Issue: 13/14, Pages: NP12352-NP12374
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
College students
Content Analysis
Gender
non-consent
refusal communication
Sexual Assault

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1884209351
003 DE-627
005 20240325123129.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240325s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0886260521997930  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1884209351 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1884209351 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Marcantonio, Tiffany L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 3 |a An Assessment of the Cues College Students Interpret From a Sexual Partner to Determine They Are Refusing 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The purpose of this study was to assess the cues college students use to determine a sexual partner is refusing vaginal-penile sex (i.e., refusal interpretations). As a secondary aim, we explored the influence of item wording (not willing/non-consent vs refusal) on college students? self-reported refusal interpretations. A sample of 175 college students from Canada and the United States completed an open-ended online survey where they were randomly assigned to one of two wording conditions (not willing/non-consent vs refusal); students were then prompted to write about the cues they used to interpret their partner was refusing. An inductive coding procedure was used to analyze open-ended data. Themes included explicit and implicit verbal and nonverbal cues. The refusal condition elicited more explicit and implicit nonverbal cues than the not willing/non-consent condition. Frequency results suggested men reported interpreting more explicit and implicit verbal cues. Women reported interpreting more implicit nonverbal cues from their partner. Our findings reflect prior research and appear in line with traditional gender and sexual scripts. We recommend researchers consider using the word refusal when assessing the cues students interpret from their sexual partners as this wording choice may reflect college students? sexual experiences more accurately. 
650 4 |a College students 
650 4 |a Content Analysis 
650 4 |a Gender 
650 4 |a non-consent 
650 4 |a refusal communication 
650 4 |a Sexual Assault 
700 1 |a Valdez, Danny  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Jozkowski, Kristen N.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of interpersonal violence  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1986  |g 37(2022), 13/14, Seite NP12352-NP12374  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324614721  |w (DE-600)2028900-5  |w (DE-576)276556305  |x 1552-6518  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:37  |g year:2022  |g number:13/14  |g pages:NP12352-NP12374 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260521997930  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4503482157 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1884209351 
LOK |0 005 20240325123129 
LOK |0 008 240325||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x zotak: Nacherfasst, da in zota-Errors 
LOK |0 935   |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw