Legally Mandated, Formally Pressured, or Voluntary Anger Treatment: Associations With Treatment Recommendations, Refusal, and Completion

Legally mandated treatment is common in the criminal justice system, for example, for anger management, substance misuse, and intimate partner violence. Past studies have compared voluntary and legally mandated treatment participants but have not distinguished a third, in-between group that is forma...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Seto, Michael C. (Author)
Contributors: Healey, Lindsay V. ; Ahmed, Adekunle G.
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
In: Journal of interpersonal violence
Year: 2022, Volume: 37, Issue: 21/22, Pages: NP20012-NP20039
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1884146902
003 DE-627
005 20240322154123.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240322s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/08862605211050100  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1884146902 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1884146902 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Seto, Michael C.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1171240910  |0 (DE-627)1040439888  |0 (DE-576)51365092X  |4 aut 
109 |a Seto, Michael C. 
245 1 0 |a Legally Mandated, Formally Pressured, or Voluntary Anger Treatment: Associations With Treatment Recommendations, Refusal, and Completion 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Legally mandated treatment is common in the criminal justice system, for example, for anger management, substance misuse, and intimate partner violence. Past studies have compared voluntary and legally mandated treatment participants but have not distinguished a third, in-between group that is formally pressured to participate in treatment, but not mandated by the criminal justice system. The current study aimed to assess differences on individual characteristics (e.g., sociodemographic and psychiatric) and baseline measures of psychopathology (e.g., anger, aggression, and depression) across three levels of voluntariness and to determine whether voluntariness was associated with treatment recommendation, refusal, and completion at an outpatient anger treatment clinic. Data were retrospectively gathered from the clinical charts of 405 participants. Referrals were classified as voluntary (e.g., self-referred, 61%), formally pressured (e.g., required by work, 14%), or legally mandated (e.g., court order, 25%). Legally mandated participants were younger, more likely to have substance use disorder, less likely to be women, to have a high school education, or to be on psychiatric medications compared to the other two groups. Voluntary participants scored higher on measures of self-reported anger, depression, and stress than the legally mandated participants. Legally mandated participants in particular presented with non-clinical levels of anger and aggression. Level of voluntariness did not affect the decision to recommend individual or group therapy after an intake assessment, but legally mandated participants were significantly more likely (OR = 2.30) than voluntary participants to refuse recommended treatment. Level of voluntariness did not have a significant association with treatment completion. Findings support our distinction between legally mandated and formally pressured participants, but do not support previous research that suggests legally mandated individuals have lower attrition rates in similar treatment programs. The study has implications for the criminal justice system and for anger treatment programs who admit participants with varying levels of voluntariness. 
650 4 |a community violence 
650 4 |a mental health and violence 
650 4 |a Violent offenders 
700 1 |a Healey, Lindsay V.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Ahmed, Adekunle G.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of interpersonal violence  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1986  |g 37(2022), 21/22, Seite NP20012-NP20039  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324614721  |w (DE-600)2028900-5  |w (DE-576)276556305  |x 1552-6518  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:37  |g year:2022  |g number:21/22  |g pages:NP20012-NP20039 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211050100  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4503061542 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1884146902 
LOK |0 005 20240322154123 
LOK |0 008 240322||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x zotak: Nacherfasst, da in zota-Errors 
LOK |0 935   |a krzo 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw