Assessing the State of Empirical Research on Johnson’s Typology of Violence: A Systematic Review

AbstractPurpose:To assess the state of empirical research on Johnson’s typology of violence.Method:Using the PRISMA Statement guidelines, we systematically review and critically evaluate peer-reviewed, empirical research studies testing Johnson’s typology, published 1995 to March 31, 2021.Findings:F...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conroy, Nicole E. (Autor) ; Crowley, Claire G. (Autor) ; DeSanto, Daniel L. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2024
En: Journal of family violence
Año: 2024, Volumen: 39, Número: 1, Páginas: 23-45
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
Gender
Intimate Partner Violence
systematic review
Mutual violent control
Violent resistance
Situational couple violence
Intimate terrorism
Coercive Control
Descripción
Sumario:AbstractPurpose:To assess the state of empirical research on Johnson’s typology of violence.Method:Using the PRISMA Statement guidelines, we systematically review and critically evaluate peer-reviewed, empirical research studies testing Johnson’s typology, published 1995 to March 31, 2021.Findings:Forty-four studies tested Johnson’s typology using accurate conceptualization and operationalization of the typology. Findings from included studies provided overwhelming support for Johnson’s typology, with only few exceptions.Conclusions:Direct tests of Johnson’s assumptions are necessary for revising and strengthening the utility of the typology. Future research should carefully attend to the conceptual definitions of Johnson’s typology and integrate explicit testing of assumptions throughout study designs.
ISSN:1573-2851
DOI:10.1007/s10896-022-00416-3