How states account for failure in Europe, interview data

The UK team conducted 39 formal face to face interviews in the UK, 4 in France, 8 in Netherlands and 5 in Germany. In addition, we hosted 3 workshops in the UK, which brought together numerous senior regulators from the UK as well as the other three countries to discuss risk-based regulation. HowSAF...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Rothstein, Henry (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Forschungsdaten
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: Colchester UK Data Service 2017
In:Jahr: 2017
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei registrierungspflichtig)
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000nam a22000002c 4500
001 1871997461
003 DE-627
005 20231205115443.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231205s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5255/UKDA-SN-852773  |2 doi 
024 8 |a 852773  |q SN 
035 |a (DE-627)1871997461 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1871997461 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Rothstein, Henry  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a How states account for failure in Europe, interview data  |c Rothstein, H., King's College London 
264 1 |a Colchester  |b UK Data Service  |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The UK team conducted 39 formal face to face interviews in the UK, 4 in France, 8 in Netherlands and 5 in Germany. In addition, we hosted 3 workshops in the UK, which brought together numerous senior regulators from the UK as well as the other three countries to discuss risk-based regulation. HowSAFE undertook a comparative investigation of the factors shaping the adoption of risk-based approaches to governance across six policy domains: occupational health and safety, flooding, food-safety, healthcare, criminal justice and education - in four European countries-France, Germany, Netherlands and UK. In so doing, it: 1) documented the application of risk-based governance across policy domains and national settings; 2) compared the application of risk instruments within and between policy domains; 3) explained the factors driving and constraining risk-based governance in Europe, and will reflect more broadly on how states account for failure and the limits of governance. ‘Risk-based’ approaches to governance are increasingly internationally promoted as universally applicable foundations for improving the quality, efficiency, and rationality of governance across policy domains. Premised on the idea that governance cannot eliminate all adverse outcomes, risk-based approaches take into account both the probability as well as the impact of potential adverse governance outcomes. In so doing, such approaches provide a means of rationalising the limits of what governance interventions can, and should, achieve. However, such approaches embody particular understandings about the meaning of governance 'failure' and 'success' and as such can conflict with governance norms and accountability structures as well as societal expectations. 
650 4 |a Regulations 
650 4 |a Risk 
650 4 |a European Union 
655 7 |a Forschungsdaten  |0 (DE-588)1098579690  |0 (DE-627)857755366  |0 (DE-576)469182156  |2 gnd-content 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-852773  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei registrierungspflichtig 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4425740629 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1871997461 
LOK |0 005 20231205115451 
LOK |0 008 231205||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a foda 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw