A Forensic Science Informational Video Can Help Mock Jurors Evaluate Forensic Expert Testimony

Forensic science is a central component of jurors’ decisions in many criminal cases. Nevertheless, research has shown that jurors are not sensitive to violations of testimonial guidelines for expert testimony in court and generally struggle to comprehend and evaluate forensic science testimony. Cons...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: LaBat, Devon E. (Author) ; Goldfarb, Deborah (Author) ; Evans, Jacqueline R. (Author) ; Schreiber, Nadja 1972- (Author) ; Koolmees, Cassidy J. (Author) ; Laporte, Gerald (Author) ; Lothridge, Kevin (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2023
In: Criminal justice and behavior
Year: 2023, Volume: 50, Issue: 11, Pages: 1716-1736
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
Description
Summary:Forensic science is a central component of jurors’ decisions in many criminal cases. Nevertheless, research has shown that jurors are not sensitive to violations of testimonial guidelines for expert testimony in court and generally struggle to comprehend and evaluate forensic science testimony. Consequently, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) developed the Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports (ULTR) to standardize the language used in such testimony. The current study created and tested a Forensic Science Informational (FSI) video as an intervention to bolster jurors’ understanding of FSI. After reading a case summary, participants were randomly assigned to read and rate five forensic expert testimony violations without any training, or to watch the FSI video before reading and rating each violation. Results revealed that participants with video exposure rated both the expert testimony and the expert themselves lower than those without such exposure, indicating they recognized the violations.
ISSN:1552-3594
DOI:10.1177/00938548231195112