|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
| 001 |
1866143751 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250128054846.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
231018s1985 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1866143751
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1866143751
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Haddad, James B.
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Pretextual Fourth Amendment Activity: Another Viewpoint
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|c 1985
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a Pretextual detentions, arrests, and searches pose knotty fourth amendment problems. With an air of plausibility, defense attorneys often accuse police of pretextual use of arrest warrants, search warrants, and various exceptions to the warrant requirement. Specifically, they contend that officers have utilized a particular fourth amendment doctrine to obtain certain evidence even though courts have not assigned as a reason for approving the doctrine the need to discover such evidence
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://core.ac.uk/download/232712783.pdf
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4391824515
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1866143751
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20231018043706
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 231018||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)CORE69339899
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a core
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
