Communities, crime prevention and the politics of articulation: A reply to Kit Carson

This article is a rejoinder to Kit Carson's seminal two-part essay, Is communalism dead? Reflections on the present and future practice of crime prevention. It aims to foster further debate on “the communal” in the field of crime prevention specifically, and in criminology more generally. In th...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hughes, Gordon (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2004
En: The Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology
Año: 2004
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1865836400
003 DE-627
005 20250125054847.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231017s2004 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1375/0004865042194395  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1865836400 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1865836400 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hughes, Gordon  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Hughes, Gordon 
245 1 0 |a Communities, crime prevention and the politics of articulation: A reply to Kit Carson 
264 1 |c 2004 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article is a rejoinder to Kit Carson's seminal two-part essay, Is communalism dead? Reflections on the present and future practice of crime prevention. It aims to foster further debate on “the communal” in the field of crime prevention specifically, and in criminology more generally. In the first part of the article, an argument is made for a progressive discourse on communities built around the theory and practice of radical communitarianism. In the second part of the article, a debate is opened up on the continuing salience of appeals to communities in the contemporary governance of crime, disorder and safety. In particular, two questions — or provocations — are briefly explored in terms of “the instabilities of community governance” and what we may term the problem of “the stranger in community safety”. Finally, the article argues for the rethinking of the relationship of the communal and the critical criminological imaginar 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Australian and New Zealand journal of criminology  |d London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1968  |g (2004)  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)355118904  |w (DE-600)2089449-1  |w (DE-576)102554234  |x 1837-9273  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g year:2004 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1375/0004865042194395  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4390874802 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1865836400 
LOK |0 005 20231017043710 
LOK |0 008 231017||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE8076830 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw