Do pre-admonition suggestions moderate the effect of unbiased lineup instructions?

We examined the additive and interactive effects of pre-admonition suggestion and lineup instructions (biased or unbiased) on eyewitness identification rates. Participants watched a mock crime video, completed a target-absent lineup identification, and completed a retrospective memory questionnaire....

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Quinlivan, Deah S. (Author)
Contributors: Neuschatz, Jeffrey S. ; Cutler, Brian L. ; Wells, Gary L. ; McClung, Joy ; Harker, Devin L.
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2012
In: Legal and criminological psychology
Year: 2012, Volume: 17, Issue: 1, Pages: 165-176
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Description
Summary:We examined the additive and interactive effects of pre-admonition suggestion and lineup instructions (biased or unbiased) on eyewitness identification rates. Participants watched a mock crime video, completed a target-absent lineup identification, and completed a retrospective memory questionnaire. Prior to attempting an identification, participants were either exposed or not exposed to pre-admonition suggestions and received biased or unbiased lineup instructions. The pre-admonition suggestion indicated that it was likely that the perpetrator was in the lineup (surely, you can pick the perpetrator). The pre-admonition suggestion increased false identification in the unbiased lineup condition. Furthermore, those who received the pre-admonition suggestion were more certain in their identifications as well as other testimony-relevant judgments than were those who did not receive the pre-admonition suggestion. These results suggest that pre-lineup suggestion can mitigate the beneficial effects of unbiased lineup instructions.
ISSN:2044-8333
DOI:10.1348/135532510X533554