Admitting evidence of a defendant's previous conviction (PCE) and its impact on juror deliberation in relation to both juror-processing style and juror concerns over the fairness of introducing PCE

Purpose. To examine the impact of admitting previous conviction evidence (PCE) on juror and jury deliberation. Major questions are: (1) Is there is an association between the inclusion of PCE and confidence in a defendant's guilt using a relatively rich trial simulation? (2) Does PCE invoke jur...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Honess, T. M. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Mathews, G. A.
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2012
En: Legal and criminological psychology
Año: 2012, Volumen: 17, Número: 2, Páginas: 360-379
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1847124623
003 DE-627
005 20230616160212.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230601s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02019.x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1847124623 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1847124623 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Honess, T. M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Admitting evidence of a defendant's previous conviction (PCE) and its impact on juror deliberation in relation to both juror-processing style and juror concerns over the fairness of introducing PCE 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Purpose. To examine the impact of admitting previous conviction evidence (PCE) on juror and jury deliberation. Major questions are: (1) Is there is an association between the inclusion of PCE and confidence in a defendant's guilt using a relatively rich trial simulation? (2) Does PCE invoke jurors’ considerations of fairness to the defendant? (3) Is heuristic processing (HP) associated with a prejudicial interpretation of evidence? Methods. In experiment 1 (n= 82), individual jurors were asked to recall evidence, express opinion, and justify verdicts on the two counts of Affray and Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH). In experiment 2 (new n= 121), PCE information was emphasized and a jury deliberation condition was included. Results. There was no simple association between admitting PCE and judgements of guilt. However, both interviews and jury deliberations indicated careful consideration of evidence. In particular, juror arguments showed that some were troubled by PCE, which they saw as unwarranted and therefore unfair to the defendant. Finally, HP was associated with both a prejudicial focus on the defendant's character and a higher confidence in guilt. Conclusions. A simple link between PCE and judgements of guilt may only hold in relatively circumscribed experimental simulations. Results also indicate that the introduction of PCE is unlikely to aid evidence-based deliberation without careful testing of different forms of judges’ explanation concerning PCE. 
700 1 |a Mathews, G. A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Legal and criminological psychology  |d Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley, 1996  |g 17(2012), 2, Seite 360-379  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320441695  |w (DE-600)2005001-X  |w (DE-576)090886615  |x 2044-8333  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2012  |g number:2  |g pages:360-379 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02019.x  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.2044-8333.2011.02019.x  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4328013483 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1847124623 
LOK |0 005 20230601115624 
LOK |0 008 230601||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw