Electronic Monitoring of Nonviolent Convicted Felons: An Experiment in Home Detention in Marion County, Indiana, 1986-1988

The purpose of the study was to provide information about home detention monitoring systems and to evaluate their effectiveness. The principal investigators sought to determine (1) whether electronic monitoring systems relieved some of the burdens associated with manual monitoring of home detention,...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Baumer, Terry L. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Mendelsohn, Robert I. (Contribuidor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Research Data
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] [Verlag nicht ermittelbar] 1991
En:Año: 1991
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1840062347
003 DE-627
005 20230325055247.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 230324s1991 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3886/ICPSR09587.v1  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1840062347 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1840062347 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Baumer, Terry L.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Baumer, Terry L.  |a Baumer, Terry Lee 
245 1 0 |a Electronic Monitoring of Nonviolent Convicted Felons: An Experiment in Home Detention in Marion County, Indiana, 1986-1988 
264 1 |a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]  |b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]  |c 1991 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The purpose of the study was to provide information about home detention monitoring systems and to evaluate their effectiveness. The principal investigators sought to determine (1) whether electronic monitoring systems relieved some of the burdens associated with manual monitoring of home detention, such as making telephone calls and field visits, (2) how home detention affected the lifestyles of offenders, (3) whether the methods of monitoring influenced offender behavior during the program, (4) how electronic monitoring differed from manual monitoring in terms of supervision of the offenders, (5) how offenders reacted to electronic monitoring, (6) how offenders' families reacted to electronic monitoring, and (7) whether the method of monitoring influenced the probability of an arrest or subsequent contact with the criminal justice system after release from the program. Part 1 contains demographic information, such as age, race, marital status, number of children, living arrangements, employment, and education for each offender. Also included is information on the offense leading to the current case, including numbers and types of charges and convictions for both felonies and misdemeanors, recommendations and judicial disposition for the current case, and information on the criminal history of the offender. Part 2 contains data from the intake interview with the offender, such as information on the offender's family, living arrangements, education, employment, past alcohol and drug use, and expectations for the home detention program and monitoring procedures. Part 3 contains information collected in the exit interview and is similar in content to Part 2. Part 4 contains information on the program delivery (type of release from the program, violations of the program, results of tests for alcohol and drug use, errand time, payment, contacts with offenders, and the characteristics and results of the contacts with electronically monitored offenders). Part 5 is a check of criminal histories of offenders for at least one year after their release from the program. 
540 |a ICPSR Terms of Use 
650 4 |a alternatives to institutionalization 
650 4 |a criminal histories 
650 4 |a CRIMINAL justice system 
650 4 |a Electronic Monitoring 
650 4 |a felony offenses 
650 4 |a House arrest 
650 4 |a misdemeanor offenses 
650 4 |a Offenders 
650 4 |a Program Evaluation 
650 4 |a supervised liberty 
655 7 |a Forschungsdaten  |0 (DE-588)1098579690  |0 (DE-627)857755366  |0 (DE-576)469182156  |2 gnd-content 
700 1 |a Mendelsohn, Robert I.  |e MitwirkendeR  |4 ctb 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09587.v1  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4296809997 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1840062347 
LOK |0 005 20230324125314 
LOK |0 008 230324||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)ICPSR9587 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a foda  |a nacj 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw