Police Practitioner-Researcher Partnerships: Survey of Law Enforcement Executives, United States, 2010
These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they are received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompany readme file for a b...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Research Data |
Language: | English |
Published: |
[Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]
[Verlag nicht ermittelbar]
2018
|
In: | Year: 2018 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Keywords: |
Summary: | These data are part of NACJD's Fast Track Release and are distributed as they are received from the data depositor. The files have been zipped by NACJD for release, but not checked or processed except for the removal of direct identifiers. Users should refer to the accompany readme file for a brief description of the files available with this collection and consult the investigator(s) if further information is needed. The purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence of police practitioner-research partnerships in the United States and examine the factors that prevent or facilitate development and sustainability of these partnerships. This study used a mixed method approach to examine the relationship between law enforcement in the United States and researchers. A nationally-representative sample of law enforcement agencies were randomly selected and given a survey in order to capture the prevalence of police practitioner-researcher partnerships and associated information. Then, representatives from 89 separate partnerships were interviewed, which were identified through the national survey. The primary purpose of these interviews was to gain insight into the barriers and facilitators of police and practitioner relationships as well as the benefits of this partnering. Lastly four case studies were conducted on model partnerships that were identified during interviews with practitioners and researchers. |
---|---|
DOI: | 10.3886/ICPSR34977.v1 |