Upholding Fundamental Rights in National Arrest Warrant Proceedings in Practice: a Need for Third Level of Judicial Protection?
The European Commission has repeatedly attempted to introduce EU legislation on pre-trial detention but has so far met with an overwhelming reluctance of Member States to address the issue. The latest initiative proposes to adopt an EU recommendation on the rights and conditions in pre-trial detenti...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Publicado: |
2022
|
| En: |
European journal on criminal policy and research
Año: 2022, Volumen: 28, Número: 3, Páginas: 451-464 |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Palabras clave: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1839951990 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240327080218.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230323s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s10610-022-09518-6 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1839951990 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1839951990 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tralmaka, Ilze |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Upholding Fundamental Rights in National Arrest Warrant Proceedings in Practice: a Need for Third Level of Judicial Protection? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The European Commission has repeatedly attempted to introduce EU legislation on pre-trial detention but has so far met with an overwhelming reluctance of Member States to address the issue. The latest initiative proposes to adopt an EU recommendation on the rights and conditions in pre-trial detention. This article seeks to highlight gaps in the protection of fundamental rights in national arrest warrant proceedings and whether standards on pre-trial detention alone will offer a solution for the full protection of fundamental rights in a cross-border context. It draws the link between the national arrest warrant, the EAW and the responsibility of the issuing state to guarantee the legality and validity of the national arrest warrant. The article finds that currently, compliance of judicial decision-making with the existing ECHR standards on pre-trial detention cannot be presumed in practice. This compliance also cannot be verified in an adversarial and equal judicial process until after the requested person has been surrendered. In the absence of a judicial process to challenge the legality of a national arrest warrant before the execution of an EAW, protection of the requested person’s rights and access to an effective remedy remains problematic. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a European arrest warrant | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judicial cooperation in criminal matters | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Mutual Trust | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pre-trial detention | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European journal on criminal policy and research |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1993 |g 28(2022), 3, Seite 451-464 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320528197 |w (DE-600)2015435-5 |w (DE-576)121465713 |x 1572-9869 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2022 |g number:3 |g pages:451-464 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-022-09518-6 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4295976989 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1839951990 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20230323160426 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 230323||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krub |a krzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||