Human rights law and the obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions

Human rights law has been called upon to help with the problem of persistently high greenhouse gas emissions. An obligation on states and other legal entities to lower their emissions (mitigation) is said to be deducible from that body of law. I refute this thesis. First, I consider two practical di...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zahar, Alexander (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
In: Human rights review
Year: 2022, Volume: 23, Issue: 3, Pages: 385-411
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 181506322X
003 DE-627
005 20231018133824.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220824s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s12142-021-00648-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)181506322X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP181506322X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Zahar, Alexander  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)133658651  |0 (DE-627)55067344X  |0 (DE-576)300004737  |4 aut 
109 |a Zahar, Alexander 
245 1 0 |a Human rights law and the obligation to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Human rights law has been called upon to help with the problem of persistently high greenhouse gas emissions. An obligation on states and other legal entities to lower their emissions (mitigation) is said to be deducible from that body of law. I refute this thesis. First, I consider two practical difficulties—causality and non-triviality—that face a plaintiff who, with emission mitigation as the objective, attempts to prove a human rights violation using the regular pattern of proof for a violation. Proponents of the “human rights approach” to mitigation have held that proof of an emission “contribution” by the defendant together with proof of an “impact” by climate change on the plaintiff’s human rights are sufficient to discharge the evidentiary burden for the proof of causation. The rest of the causation chain is simply presumed. Thus, the original proof pattern for a human rights violation is abandoned. The proponents’ answer to the triviality difficulty has been to aggregate emitters into very large entities and sue them. However, aggregation can be shown to lead to a reductio ad absurdum. In my argument’s second part, I identify a more fundamental difficulty with the human rights approach to mitigation: The defendant’s emissions do not amount to a norm violation. Everyone contributes emissions without legislative or other prohibition. Treaty law on climate change itself recognizes emitting behaviour as lawful and permits the continuation of state emissions through to at least 2050. A rise in global warming from preindustrial levels to 1.5° Celsius with room for an even greater rise to close to 2° Celsius has been budgeted for by the Paris Agreement on Climate Change. The setting up of a budget affirms the normalized status of within-budget emissions. This universal license to emit denies the human rights approach to mitigation the very conditions of application of human rights law. 
650 4 |a Milieudefensie et al. v. Shell case 
650 4 |a Urgenda v. The Netherlands case 
650 4 |a Conditions of application of human rights law 
650 4 |a Test for a violation of human rights 
650 4 |a Paris Agreement on Climate Change 
650 4 |a Kyoto Protocol to UNFCCC 
650 4 |a United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 
650 4 |a Emission-reduction (mitigation) obligations 
650 4 |a Climate Change 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Human rights review  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1999  |g 23(2022), 3, Seite 385-411  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320607771  |w (DE-600)2020969-1  |w (DE-576)109633938  |x 1874-6306  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:23  |g year:2022  |g number:3  |g pages:385-411 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-021-00648-8  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4182361318 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 181506322X 
LOK |0 005 20220824051535 
LOK |0 008 220824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2022-08-23#7A50912B2887D5824DD1EE539A3C3327EA3FC37B 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw