Parole Officer Decision-Making Before Parole Revocation: Why Context Is Key When Delivering Correctional Services
Back-end sentencing is the discretionary, administrative process through which individuals on parole are returned to prison for violating the requirements of their supervised release. Parole officers play a crucial role in this process as they are the witnesses to the rule-breaking behaviors of peop...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; | 
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz | 
| Sprache: | Englisch | 
| Veröffentlicht: | 
          
        2022
     | 
| In: | 
      Criminal justice policy review          
     Jahr: 2022, Band: 33, Heft: 3, Seiten: 273-297  | 
| Online-Zugang: | 
                  Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)                 | 
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway | 
| Schlagwörter: | 
| Zusammenfassung: | Back-end sentencing is the discretionary, administrative process through which individuals on parole are returned to prison for violating the requirements of their supervised release. Parole officers play a crucial role in this process as they are the witnesses to the rule-breaking behaviors of people on parole supervision and ultimately must initiate the back-end sentencing process. This study explores predictors of parole officer decision-making when determining whether to consider a person for revocation or to gear programmatic community-based resources toward them in an attempt to decrease the likelihood of their eventual revocation. Our results indicate that if people released to parole are front-loaded programmatic resources as a part of their release conditions from prison, the odds that parole officers subsequently gear community-based programs toward them decreases by approximately 60%. Other factors such as demographics, actuarial risk levels, and criminal history were not significantly predictive of officer decision-making in this context. | 
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1552-3586 | 
| DOI: | 10.1177/08874034211035494 | 
