A comparative perspective on officer wellness: american reflections from norwegian prisons

Correctional officers in the United States experience severe work-related stressors and are generally physically unwell compared to similar public employees. An innovative and new approach to improving American corrections that is starting to gain momentum stems from looking at the workplace dynamic...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Horowitz, Veronica L. (Author)
Contributors: Greberman, Emily R. ; Nolan, Patrick E. ; Hyatt, Jordan M. ; Uggen, Chris ; Andersen, Synøve N. ; Chanenson, Steven L.
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
In: Criminal justice studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 34, Issue: 4, Pages: 477-497
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
Description
Summary:Correctional officers in the United States experience severe work-related stressors and are generally physically unwell compared to similar public employees. An innovative and new approach to improving American corrections that is starting to gain momentum stems from looking at the workplace dynamic in alternative international models, such as in Scandinavian prison systems, for models of workplace reform. This study examines the perspectives of staff and leaders from the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections who traveled to Scandinavia as part of a correctional exchange. Each day of the trip, correctional staff recorded their qualitative reflections and completed a basic survey about their observations and experiences. This article examines both forms of data to explore correctional officer wellness from the perspective of American correctional officers. Five key themes are discussed: morale, stress, danger, dynamic security, and communication. Survey results corroborate this pattern, as US correctional officers reported somewhat lower stress and more positive interactions during their time in Norway. Key takeaways and implications for policy are discussed.
ISSN:1478-6028
DOI:10.1080/1478601X.2021.2001231