Therapeutically (Un)Just Interactions in Family Court Proceedings

Court systems have a unique and powerful impact on the lives of persons who enter into them. In recognition of some of the deleterious effects of traditional court models, scholars and practitioners advocate for alternative court processes, especially through the implementation of specialty courts....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Dollar, Cindy Brooks 1975- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2020
En: Criminal justice policy review
Año: 2020, Volumen: 31, Número: 2, Páginas: 262-286
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1774385244
003 DE-627
005 20211018153705.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211018s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/0887403418812170  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1774385244 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1774385244 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Dollar, Cindy Brooks  |d 1975-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1235472515  |0 (DE-627)1760471631  |4 aut 
109 |a Dollar, Cindy Brooks 1975-  |a Brooks Dollar, Cindy 1975- 
245 1 0 |a Therapeutically (Un)Just Interactions in Family Court Proceedings 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Court systems have a unique and powerful impact on the lives of persons who enter into them. In recognition of some of the deleterious effects of traditional court models, scholars and practitioners advocate for alternative court processes, especially through the implementation of specialty courts. Family court is a type of specialized court, which handles legal disputes among family members. The stated mission of family courts reflects notions of therapeutic jurisprudence; however, scarce research examines if therapeutic jurisprudence is actually practiced in family court settings. Using 12 months of observational data of over 100 hearings, the present study assesses the extent to which principles of therapeutic jurisprudence are apparent in court proceedings. I find that although therapeutically just interactions are common in family court, some encounters remain antitherapeutic or damaging. The implication of family court’s current operation within the broader “justice” system is discussed. 
650 4 |a Family Court 
650 4 |a Problem-solving courts 
650 4 |a specialty court 
650 4 |a Therapeutic Jurisprudence 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Criminal justice policy review  |d London : Sage, 1986  |g 31(2020), 2, Seite 262-286  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)33150796X  |w (DE-600)2051883-3  |w (DE-576)094502471  |x 1552-3586  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:2020  |g number:2  |g pages:262-286 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0887403418812170  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3991079615 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1774385244 
LOK |0 005 20211018153623 
LOK |0 008 211018||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw