Beyond crime seriousness: Fitting the punishment to the crime

This paper presents an exposition of how the factorial survey approach may enhance empirical assessments of the complex judgment principles involved in public views of just punishments for convicted offenders. Ratings of the appropriateness of sentences given across 50 typical crimes obtained from a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rossi, Peter H. 1921-2006 (Author)
Contributors: Simpson, Jon E. ; Miller, JoAnn L. 1949-
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 1985
In: Journal of quantitative criminology
Year: 1985, Volume: 1, Issue: 1, Pages: 59-90
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
just punishments
Crime seriousness
vignette studies
Factorial surveys
Description
Summary:This paper presents an exposition of how the factorial survey approach may enhance empirical assessments of the complex judgment principles involved in public views of just punishments for convicted offenders. Ratings of the appropriateness of sentences given across 50 typical crimes obtained from a household sample ( N =774) of the Boston SMSA and several special-interest samples in 1982 are examined in three alternative ordinary least-squares (OLS) regression equations. These analyses show there is not a one-to-one direct relationship between public perceptions of the seriousness of criminal acts and desired sanctions. Crime seriousness is modified by the characteristics of the offenders and victims and by the consequences of the crimes. Preferred punishments also vary in severity by demographic, experiential, and attitudinal characteristics of the persons who make the judgments.
ISSN:1573-7799
DOI:10.1007/BF01065249