Cross-cultural reliability and rater bias in forensic risk assessment: a review of the literature

Risk assessment instruments are frequently employed in criminal justice settings to predict recidivism and inform treatment plans for offenders. Modern approaches to risk assessment, (i.e. Structured Professional Judgment and actuarial instruments), have been found to accurately predict recidivism f...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Venner, Samantha (Author)
Contributors: Luebbers, Stefan ; Shepherd, Stephane M. ; Sivasubramaniam, Diane
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
In: Psychology, crime & law
Year: 2021, Volume: 27, Issue: 2, Pages: 105-121
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1766515185
003 DE-627
005 20210812092528.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210812s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/1068316X.2020.1775829  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1766515185 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1766515185 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Venner, Samantha  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Cross-cultural reliability and rater bias in forensic risk assessment  |b a review of the literature 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Risk assessment instruments are frequently employed in criminal justice settings to predict recidivism and inform treatment plans for offenders. Modern approaches to risk assessment, (i.e. Structured Professional Judgment and actuarial instruments), have been found to accurately predict recidivism for both juvenile and adult offenders, although concerns have been raised regarding their applicability to Non-White cultural groups. Furthermore, research has suggested that rater bias may impact upon risk assessment scoring in various aspects of the risk assessment process. This paper explores whether rater bias may offer an explanation for the differential application and predictive validity of risk assessment for some cultural groups. Firstly, literature examining the differential scoring of risk assessment instruments across cultures was explored. Following this, existing literature on rater variability in risk assessment - encompassing areas such as interrater reliability, adversarial allegiance, professional override and rater training - was synthesised. Despite the lack of research specifically examining rater cultural bias in risk assessment, this paper finds that the risk assessment process may be vulnerable to rater biases. At the very least, the notion of rater cross-cultural bias in risk assessment warrants further investigation, and suggestions for future research are offered. 
650 4 |a Risk Assessment 
650 4 |a actuarial risk assessment 
650 4 |a Culture 
650 4 |a Interrater reliability 
650 4 |a rater bias 
650 4 |a structured professional judgment 
700 1 |a Luebbers, Stefan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Shepherd, Stephane M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Sivasubramaniam, Diane  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Psychology, crime & law  |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994  |g 27(2021), 2, Seite 105-121  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341903574  |w (DE-600)2070124-X  |w (DE-576)27234995X  |x 1477-2744  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2021  |g number:2  |g pages:105-121 
856 4 0 |u https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2020.1775829  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3966218895 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1766515185 
LOK |0 005 20210812092528 
LOK |0 008 210812||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub  |a krzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw