Response to “Methodological Sensitivities to Latent Class Analysis of Long-Term Criminal Trajectories”
This response to “Methodological Sensitivities to Latent Class Analysis of Long-Term Criminal Trajectories” is intended to make three key points: (1) the data sensitivities that are explored in that paper are examples of two generic data problems that transcend the specific methodology used to analy...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
2004
|
En: |
Journal of quantitative criminology
Año: 2004, Volumen: 20, Número: 1, Páginas: 27-35 |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Palabras clave: |
Sumario: | This response to “Methodological Sensitivities to Latent Class Analysis of Long-Term Criminal Trajectories” is intended to make three key points: (1) the data sensitivities that are explored in that paper are examples of two generic data problems that transcend the specific methodology used to analyze longitudinal data, (2) while real sensitivities are identified, the overall stability of results is also noteworthy, and (3) the groups must be understood to be approximations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-7799 |
DOI: | 10.1023/B:JOQC.0000016697.85827.22 |