Support forMiranda among police chiefs: A qualitative examination

The U.S. Supreme Court recently grappled with the question of whether it should overturn the landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona. Abolitionists argued the warnings handcuffed the police and allowed many criminals to go free. Proponents maintained Miranda protected offenders and engendered a certain...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Payne, Brian K. (Author)
Contributors: Time, Victoria M.
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2000
In: American journal of criminal justice
Year: 2000, Volume: 25, Issue: 1, Pages: 65-76
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1764207009
003 DE-627
005 20210723061656.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210723s2000 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF02886811  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1764207009 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1764207009 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Payne, Brian K.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Support forMiranda among police chiefs: A qualitative examination 
264 1 |c 2000 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The U.S. Supreme Court recently grappled with the question of whether it should overturn the landmark case of Miranda v. Arizona. Abolitionists argued the warnings handcuffed the police and allowed many criminals to go free. Proponents maintained Miranda protected offenders and engendered a certain level of professionalism among police officers. Before the Court decided to uphold Miranda, 95 police chiefs from the Commonwealth of Virginia were surveyed about their perceptions concerning Miranda. While one could categorize many chiefs as conformists who wished to keep the warnings, a significant proportion were innovators who advocated various changes. Reasons for these beliefs and their implications are discussed. 
650 4 |a Police Chief 
650 4 |a Innocent Person 
650 4 |a Defense Attorney 
650 4 |a Attorney General 
650 4 |a Police Officer 
700 1 |a Time, Victoria M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t American journal of criminal justice  |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer, 1975  |g 25(2000), 1, Seite 65-76  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)545782163  |w (DE-600)2387971-3  |w (DE-576)306834987  |x 1936-1351  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:25  |g year:2000  |g number:1  |g pages:65-76 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02886811  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/pdf?id=doi:10.1007/BF02886811  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3957031524 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1764207009 
LOK |0 005 20210723061656 
LOK |0 008 210723||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-22#3D7B45DAF870BF3B92921D5992450F963A1261B2 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw