What does “knock and announce” mean? An analysis ofWilson v. Arkansas and its progeny
The U.S. Supreme Court held in Wilson v. Arkansas (1994) that the common law “knock-and-announce” principle formed part of the “reasonableness” inquiry under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Court’s opinion gave little guidance as to what would be unreasonable under these circumstances. Some criti...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2002
|
| In: |
American journal of criminal justice
Jahr: 2002, Band: 26, Heft: 2, Seiten: 287-303 |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Schlagwörter: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1764202988 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210723061647.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210723s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF02887832 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1764202988 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1764202988 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Jones, David M. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What does “knock and announce” mean? An analysis ofWilson v. Arkansas and its progeny |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The U.S. Supreme Court held in Wilson v. Arkansas (1994) that the common law “knock-and-announce” principle formed part of the “reasonableness” inquiry under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Court’s opinion gave little guidance as to what would be unreasonable under these circumstances. Some critics expressed concern that this lack of guidance would lead to many variations among lower courts. Other observers discerned a signal that little should be deemed “unreasonable” in the context of “knock and announce.” These criticisms are analyzed through a review of lower court interpretations of Wilson. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Fourth Amendment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Lower Court | |
| 650 | 4 | |a State Court | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Supreme Court Decision | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Police Officer | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t American journal of criminal justice |d New York, NY [u.a.] : Springer, 1975 |g 26(2002), 2, Seite 287-303 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)545782163 |w (DE-600)2387971-3 |w (DE-576)306834987 |x 1936-1351 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:26 |g year:2002 |g number:2 |g pages:287-303 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887832 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://link.springer.com/openurl/pdf?id=doi:10.1007/BF02887832 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mkri | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3957027500 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1764202988 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210723061647 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210723||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-22#24547D5677F312EF993A9923EE312315A789F916 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||
