What does “knock and announce” mean? An analysis ofWilson v. Arkansas and its progeny
The U.S. Supreme Court held in Wilson v. Arkansas (1994) that the common law “knock-and-announce” principle formed part of the “reasonableness” inquiry under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Court’s opinion gave little guidance as to what would be unreasonable under these circumstances. Some criti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2002
|
In: |
American journal of criminal justice
Year: 2002, Volume: 26, Issue: 2, Pages: 287-303 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Keywords: |
Summary: | The U.S. Supreme Court held in Wilson v. Arkansas (1994) that the common law “knock-and-announce” principle formed part of the “reasonableness” inquiry under the Fourth Amendment. However, the Court’s opinion gave little guidance as to what would be unreasonable under these circumstances. Some critics expressed concern that this lack of guidance would lead to many variations among lower courts. Other observers discerned a signal that little should be deemed “unreasonable” in the context of “knock and announce.” These criticisms are analyzed through a review of lower court interpretations of Wilson. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1936-1351 |
DOI: | 10.1007/BF02887832 |