Normative view of natural resources: global redistribution or human rights-based approach?

This paper contrasts conceptions of global distributive justice focused on natural resources with human rights–based approach. To emphasize the advantages of the latter, the paper analyzes three areas: (1) the methodology of normative theorizing about natural resources, (2) the category of natural r...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gümplová, Petra (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
In: Human rights review
Year: 2021, Volume: 22, Issue: 2, Pages: 155-172
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Rights Information:CC BY 4.0
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1762462745
003 DE-627
005 20240327222127.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210708s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s12142-021-00615-3  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1762462745 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1762462745 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Gümplová, Petra  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)124199594X  |0 (DE-627)1771913398  |4 aut 
109 |a Gümplová, Petra 
245 1 0 |a Normative view of natural resources  |b global redistribution or human rights-based approach?  |c Petra Gümplová 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
506 0 |a Open Access  |e Controlled Vocabulary for Access Rights  |u http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 
520 |a This paper contrasts conceptions of global distributive justice focused on natural resources with human rights–based approach. To emphasize the advantages of the latter, the paper analyzes three areas: (1) the methodology of normative theorizing about natural resources, (2) the category of natural resources, and (3) the view of the system of sovereignty over natural resources. Concerning the first, I argue that global justice conceptions misconstrue the claims made to natural resources and offer conceptions which are practically unfeasible. Concerning the second, I show that contemporary philosophy of justice downplays the plurality of meanings resources have for collectives and argue that conflicts over natural resources can best be accounted for using human rights. Finally, the paper looks at sovereignty over natural resources and argues that rather than dismissing it as unjustifiable on moral grounds, it should be reformed in line with valid principles of international law, most importantly with human rights. 
540 |a Namensnennung 4.0 International  |f CC BY 4.0  |2 cc  |u https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 
650 4 |a Sovereignty over natural resources 
650 4 |a Human rights approach 
650 4 |a Global distributive justice 
650 4 |a Natural resources 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Human rights review  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1999  |g 22(2021), 2, Seite 155-172  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320607771  |w (DE-600)2020969-1  |w (DE-576)109633938  |x 1874-6306  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:22  |g year:2021  |g number:2  |g pages:155-172 
856 |u https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12142-021-00615-3.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-021-00615-3  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3946504264 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1762462745 
LOK |0 005 20210708061719 
LOK |0 008 210708||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2021-07-07#24982ACBCF803A227C13A6D68E749964AA5B1531 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw