Turning the corner on procedural justice theory: exploring reverse causality with an experimental vignette in a longitudinal survey
Traditional police procedural justice theory argues that citizen perceptions of fair treatment by police officers increase police legitimacy, which leads to an increased likelihood of legal compliance. Recently, Nagin and Telep (2017) criticized these causal assumptions, arguing that prior literatur...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Beteiligte: | ; ; ; |
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Veröffentlicht: |
2019
|
In: |
Journal of experimental criminology
Jahr: 2019, Band: 15, Heft: 4, Seiten: 661-671 |
Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Schlagwörter: |
Zusammenfassung: | Traditional police procedural justice theory argues that citizen perceptions of fair treatment by police officers increase police legitimacy, which leads to an increased likelihood of legal compliance. Recently, Nagin and Telep (2017) criticized these causal assumptions, arguing that prior literature has not definitively ruled out reverse causality—that is, legitimacy influences perceptions of fairness and/or compliance influences perceptions of both fairness and legitimacy. The goal of the present paper was to explore this critique using experimental and correlational methodologies within a longitudinal framework. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1572-8315 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11292-019-09358-1 |