Is more law the answer? Seeking justice for victims of intimate partner violence through the reform of legal categories

In 2015 in England and Wales a new offence of controlling or coercive behaviour was introduced with the aim of improving legal responses to intimate partner violence. Recognizing the historical limits of legal interventions in this area, this article examines the efficacy of coercive control as a co...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walklate, Sandra 1950- (Autor) ; Fitz-Gibbon, Kate (Autor) ; McCulloch, Jude 1958- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2018
En: Criminology & criminal justice
Año: 2018, Volumen: 18, Número: 1, Páginas: 115-131
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
Descripción
Sumario:In 2015 in England and Wales a new offence of controlling or coercive behaviour was introduced with the aim of improving legal responses to intimate partner violence. Recognizing the historical limits of legal interventions in this area, this article examines the efficacy of coercive control as a conceptual device for improving access to law and justice outcomes for women victims. To do so, it considers the problems and possibilities of translating a concept generated from clinical practice into legal practice alongside an exploration of the potential unintended consequences of this new offence. The gendered analysis undertaken here reveals the limitations of framing women’s experiences as ‘coercive control’ in law and concludes that, in the case of coercive control, more law is not the answer to improving responses to intimate partner violence.
ISSN:1748-8966
DOI:10.1177/1748895817728561