An intersectional approach to race/ethnicity, sex, and age disparity in federal sentencing outcomes: an examination of policy across time periods
Approaches to intersectionality stress the importance of recognizing multiple, intersecting inequalities. As such, recent sentencing research has examined the changing role of extra-legal characteristics on United States federal sentencing outcomes in the aftermath of recent policy changes (e.g. Uni...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2017
|
| In: |
Criminology & criminal justice
Year: 2017, Volume: 17, Issue: 1, Pages: 97-116 |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
| Summary: | Approaches to intersectionality stress the importance of recognizing multiple, intersecting inequalities. As such, recent sentencing research has examined the changing role of extra-legal characteristics on United States federal sentencing outcomes in the aftermath of recent policy changes (e.g. United States v. Booker), but scholarship has less often examined these characteristics at the intersections of race/ethnicity, gender, and, especially age. This article uses an intersectional approach to examine the influence of these characteristics net of legally relevant characteristics. Using ordinary least squares regression procedures, the author examines the role of the joint effects of extra-legal variables on sentence length decisions across four distinct time periods. Net of control variables, results indicate that young black men are the group most likely to receive the longest sentences, but interesting differences between other groups also emerge. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1748-8966 |
| DOI: | 10.1177/1748895816642502 |
