The Individual-Level Deterrent Effect of “Call-In” Meetings on Time to Re-Arrest
Focused on deterrence popular model to address community-level violence, however little research has examined the individual-level effect of deterrent messaging on subsequent offending. To answer this question, we utilize data on 254 gang- and group-involved probationers and parolees who attended of...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; ; ; |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2020
|
| In: |
Crime & delinquency
Jahr: 2020, Band: 66, Heft: 11, Seiten: 1630-1651 |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Schlagwörter: |
| Zusammenfassung: | Focused on deterrence popular model to address community-level violence, however little research has examined the individual-level effect of deterrent messaging on subsequent offending. To answer this question, we utilize data on 254 gang- and group-involved probationers and parolees who attended offender “call-in” meetings as part of the Detroit Ceasefire. We employ inverse-probability weighting to construct a counterfactual comparison group from a sample of gang-involved young adults who were not subject to the Ceasefire call-in. We then use a Cox regression to estimate time to re-arrest. We find that individuals who were delivered a deterrent message at a call-in meeting had a longer time to re-arrest compared to a weighted comparison group for up to 3 years following the meeting. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1552-387X |
| DOI: | 10.1177/0011128719885869 |
