Time-Free Effects in Predicting Recidivism Using Both Fixed and Variable Follow-Up Periods: Do Different Methods Produce Different Results

Flores, Anthony W.; Cohen, Thomas H.; Holsinger, Alexander M.; Lowenkamp, Christopher Tyson

doi:10.1177/0093854816678649

Time-Free Effects in Predicting Recidivism Using Both Fixed and Variable Follow-Up Periods: Do Different Methods Produce Different Results

We provide a comparison of analyses used to estimate predictive validity, across fixed (logistic regression and area under the curve receiver operating characteristic [AUC-ROC]) and variable (Cox regression and Harrell’s C) lengths of follow-up. This study adds to research demonstrating a relationsh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
VerfasserInnen:	Flores, Anthony W. (Verfasst von) ; Cohen, Thomas H. (Verfasst von) ; Holsinger, Alexander M. (Verfasst von) ; Lowenkamp, Christopher Tyson (Verfasst von)
Medienart:	Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:	Englisch
Veröffentlicht:	[2017]
In:	Criminal justice and behavior Jahr: 2017, Band: 44, Heft: 1, Seiten: 121-137
Online-Zugang:	Volltext (Resolving-System)
Verfügbarkeit prüfen:	HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:	Time at risk offense free Predictive validity Cox regression Logistic regression