Public perceptions of the seriousness of crime: Weighing the harm and the wrong

The seriousness of crime or ‘crime seriousness' bears on at least four areas of criminal policy (sentencing, criminalization, crime control and prevention) but is poorly defined. After providing a novel conceptualization of crime seriousness, this article explores the logic - or normative philo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Adriaenssen, An (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Greenfield, Victoria A. 1964- ; Karstedt, Susanne 1949- ; Paoli, Letizia 1966- ; Pleysier, Stefaan ; Visschers, Jonas
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2020
In: European journal of criminology
Jahr: 2020, Band: 17, Heft: 2, Seiten: 127-150
Online-Zugang: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:
Crime seriousness
Harm
Wrong moralism
Criminal policy
Public opinion
Sentencing
Penal policy
Criminalization
Crime control
Crime prevention
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The seriousness of crime or ‘crime seriousness' bears on at least four areas of criminal policy (sentencing, criminalization, crime control and prevention) but is poorly defined. After providing a novel conceptualization of crime seriousness, this article explores the logic - or normative philosophical principles - behind the public's assessment of crime seriousness and considers how the public's logic aligns with legal principles and policy requirements. A general population survey administered in 2014 in Belgium and eliciting 1278 valid responses indicates that the public's logic is more moralist than consequentialist and raises doubts about the validity of public perceptions of crime seriousness as an indicator of crime seriousness for policy-making.
ISSN:1741-2609
DOI:10.1177/1477370818772768