Racial animosity, adversary effect, and hate crime: parsing out injuries in intraracial, interracial, and race-based offenses

Although most crime in intraracial, studies suggest that interracial victimization is more injurious. This may be especially true for racially motivated offenses; however, studies of hate crime have not disaggregated which racial dyads are associated with injury, and whether they are more injurious...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Powers, Ráchael A. (Autor)
Otros Autores: Socia, Kelly M.
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2019
En: Crime & delinquency
Año: 2019, Volumen: 65, Número: 4, Páginas: 447-473
Acceso en línea: Volltext (Verlag)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
Feindseligkeit
Hasskriminalität
Hate crime
Injury
NIBRS
Racial animus
Rasse
Descripción
Sumario:Although most crime in intraracial, studies suggest that interracial victimization is more injurious. This may be especially true for racially motivated offenses; however, studies of hate crime have not disaggregated which racial dyads are associated with injury, and whether they are more injurious than interracial victimizations generally. Likewise, studies of interracial violence often assume a theoretical framework grounded in racial animosity, but cannot test motivation directly. Using the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), this study compares injuries across intraracial, interracial, and bias-motivated offenses. We find differences across racial dyad and the presence of racial animosity, however, the results are largely driven by the race of the offender. Implications for racial animosity theory, adversary effect, and hate crime literatures are discussed.
ISSN:1552-387X
DOI:10.1177/0011128718779566