A Reconceptualization of General and Specific Deterrence

The distinction between general and specific deterrence is widely recognized and accepted by deterrence researchers, and is used commonly to classify deterrence studies. However; the logical and empirical grounds for the distinction are not as clear as they might appear; and the conventional concept...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stafford, Mark C. (Author)
Contributors: Warr, Mark
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Published: 1993
In: Journal of research in crime and delinquency
Year: 1993, Volume: 30, Issue: 2, Pages: 123-135
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1640352856
003 DE-627
005 20220608131802.0
007 tu
008 160223s1993 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1640352856 
035 |a (DE-576)456123768 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ456123768 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
100 1 |a Stafford, Mark C.  |0 (DE-588)1125909706  |0 (DE-627)880480866  |0 (DE-576)167958429  |4 aut 
109 |a Stafford, Mark C.  |a Stafford, Mark 
245 1 2 |a A Reconceptualization of General and Specific Deterrence  |c Mark C. Stafford, Mark Warr 
264 1 |c 1993 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The distinction between general and specific deterrence is widely recognized and accepted by deterrence researchers, and is used commonly to classify deterrence studies. However; the logical and empirical grounds for the distinction are not as clear as they might appear; and the conventional conception has done more to obfuscate than to clarify the deterrence process. Following a discussion of these issues, the authors propose a reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence, and apply it to several current controversies in the deterrence literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] 
700 1 |a Warr, Mark  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Journal of research in crime and delinquency  |d Thousand Oaks [u.a.] : Sage, 1964  |g 30(1993), 2, Seite 123-135  |w (DE-627)130438405  |w (DE-600)700175-7  |w (DE-576)015931730  |x 0022-4278  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:1993  |g number:2  |g pages:123-135 
776 1 |o 10.1177/0022427893030002001 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3301958680 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1640352856 
LOK |0 005 20250505135353 
LOK |0 008 160208||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Abschreckungstheorie 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Generalpräventionsforschung 
LOK |0 689   |a s  |a Spezialpräventionsforschung 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a k110 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw