A Reconceptualization of General and Specific Deterrence
The distinction between general and specific deterrence is widely recognized and accepted by deterrence researchers, and is used commonly to classify deterrence studies. However; the logical and empirical grounds for the distinction are not as clear as they might appear; and the conventional concept...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
1993
|
| In: |
Journal of research in crime and delinquency
Year: 1993, Volume: 30, Issue: 2, Pages: 123-135 |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
| Summary: | The distinction between general and specific deterrence is widely recognized and accepted by deterrence researchers, and is used commonly to classify deterrence studies. However; the logical and empirical grounds for the distinction are not as clear as they might appear; and the conventional conception has done more to obfuscate than to clarify the deterrence process. Following a discussion of these issues, the authors propose a reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence, and apply it to several current controversies in the deterrence literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0022-4278 |
