A Reconceptualization of General and Specific Deterrence
The distinction between general and specific deterrence is widely recognized and accepted by deterrence researchers, and is used commonly to classify deterrence studies. However; the logical and empirical grounds for the distinction are not as clear as they might appear; and the conventional concept...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
1993
|
In: |
Journal of research in crime and delinquency
Year: 1993, Volume: 30, Issue: 2, Pages: 123-135 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Availability in Tübingen: | Present in Tübingen. IFK: In: Z 31 |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Keywords: |
Summary: | The distinction between general and specific deterrence is widely recognized and accepted by deterrence researchers, and is used commonly to classify deterrence studies. However; the logical and empirical grounds for the distinction are not as clear as they might appear; and the conventional conception has done more to obfuscate than to clarify the deterrence process. Following a discussion of these issues, the authors propose a reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence, and apply it to several current controversies in the deterrence literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-4278 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0022427893030002001 |