Reply to Webster, Gartner, and Doob
The article presents the reactions of Ron Langevin, Suzanne Curnoe and Paul Fedoroff on the criticism of Cheryl Webster, Rosemary Gartner and Anthony Doob on their article "Lifetime Sex Offender Recidivism: A 25-Year Follow-Up Study" which was published in the October 2004 issue of "C...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | ; |
Format: | Print Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2006
|
In: |
Canadian journal of criminology and criminal justice
Year: 2006, Volume: 48, Issue: 1, Pages: 107-117 |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Keywords: |
Summary: | The article presents the reactions of Ron Langevin, Suzanne Curnoe and Paul Fedoroff on the criticism of Cheryl Webster, Rosemary Gartner and Anthony Doob on their article "Lifetime Sex Offender Recidivism: A 25-Year Follow-Up Study" which was published in the October 2004 issue of "Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice". It states that the criticism are made through inappropriate data comparison and omissions of facts. The authors believed that they have conducted proper studies, correct information and extensive research that support their conclusions in their article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1707-7753 |