An obligation to make a difference in the real world?: thoughts on the proper role of criminologists and critical criminologist in the 21st century
In this paper, I summarize and react to papers published in Western Criminology Review, by Elliott Currie and Richard Hil. In a series of papers that began with Currie’s verbal address to the Western Society of Criminology, he and Richard Hil attempted to lay out the proper role of academic criminol...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2003
|
| In: |
Western criminology review
Year: 2003, Volume: 4, Issue: 3, Pages: 226-238 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
| Summary: | In this paper, I summarize and react to papers published in Western Criminology Review, by Elliott Currie and Richard Hil. In a series of papers that began with Currie’s verbal address to the Western Society of Criminology, he and Richard Hil attempted to lay out the proper role of academic criminologists, especially those who consider themselves “critical criminologists.” In this article, I summarize the main points of each author and provide commentary on each written piece. I conclude by clarifying what I feel should be the proper role of criminologists generally, with special emphasis on the issue of “critical criminology” and its duty to bring about change to the current state of the discipline. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 237 |
