A comparison between self-report and interview-based inventories in offender classification
A paper-and-pencil measure of offender risk/needs was derived from the Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI), an interview-based classification instrument. This resulting Self-Report Inventory (SRI) was evaluated on 100 male inmates with respect to reliability, validity, and utility. A psychometric b...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Druck Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
1992
|
| In: |
Criminal justice and behavior
Jahr: 1992, Band: 19, Heft: 2, Seiten: 143-159 |
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Schlagwörter: |
| Zusammenfassung: | A paper-and-pencil measure of offender risk/needs was derived from the Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI), an interview-based classification instrument. This resulting Self-Report Inventory (SRI) was evaluated on 100 male inmates with respect to reliability, validity, and utility. A psychometric battery including the LSI was administered. The SRI demonstrated acceptable interrater reliability and internal consistency as well as modest validity. The results suggest that offender self-reports, in combination with more traditional risks/needs assessment, can be useful for offender prediction and the identification of needs |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0093-8548 |
