Violence as honorable?: racial and ethnic differences in attitudes toward violence : Mary R. Rose and Christopher G. Ellison
Criminologists have suggested that Latinos differ from Southern Whites in their views of violence. A sample of 1,429 Texans indicated whether they agreed that violence deserves a violent response, whether violence is necessary to prevent future violence, and whether people have a right to kill in de...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
In: |
Crime & delinquency
Year: 2016, Volume: 62, Issue: 6, Pages: 800-820 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Keywords: |
Summary: | Criminologists have suggested that Latinos differ from Southern Whites in their views of violence. A sample of 1,429 Texans indicated whether they agreed that violence deserves a violent response, whether violence is necessary to prevent future violence, and whether people have a right to kill in defense of self or family. Controlling for other factors, Latinos and African Americans were more likely than non-Hispanic Whites to disagree about the need for violence in preventing future harm and the right to self-defense. Less-acculturated Latinos, indicated by whether they took the survey in Spanish, were the least supportive of violence. Despite having roots in a so-called “culture of honor,” Latino immigrants, as well as those who are U.S. citizens, have distinct views on violence. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1552-387X |
DOI: | 10.1177/001112871349600 |