A critique of the universalisability of critical human rights theory: the displacement of Immanuel Kant
While the critically oriented writings of Immanuel Kant remain the key theoretical grounds from which universalists challenge reduction of international rights law and protection to the practical particularities of sovereign states, Kant’s theory can be read as also a crucial argument for a human ri...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2013
|
| In: |
Human rights review
Jahr: 2013, Band: 14, Heft: 4, Seiten: 367-385 |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Schlagwörter: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 783736312 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250811090531.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 140424s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s12142-013-0284-0 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)783736312 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)9783736310 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)GBV783736312 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Franke, Mark F. N. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A critique of the universalisability of critical human rights theory |b the displacement of Immanuel Kant |c Mark F. N. Franke |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 384-385 | ||
| 520 | |a While the critically oriented writings of Immanuel Kant remain the key theoretical grounds from which universalists challenge reduction of international rights law and protection to the practical particularities of sovereign states, Kant’s theory can be read as also a crucial argument for a human rights regime ordered around sovereign states and citizens. Consequently, universalists may be tempted to push Kant’s thinking to greater critical examination of ‘the human’ and its properties. However, such a move to more theoretical rigour in critique only solidifies the subversive statism of Kant’s apparent universalism, as long as it remains embedded in his prior theory of critical philosophy that privileges a singular form of reason. Universalist theories of human rights can break with this contradiction only insofar as they also displace the right to philosophy from the subject and site of ‘civil’ man to a politics of theory where no such subject or site is guaranteed. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Kant | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human Rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Universal | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Freedom | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Practice | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Human rights review |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1999 |g 14(2013), 4, Seite 367-385 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320607771 |w (DE-600)2020969-1 |w (DE-576)109633938 |x 1874-6306 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2013 |g number:4 |g pages:367-385 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-013-0284-0 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12142-013-0284-0 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 477118609X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 783736312 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250912123255 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250912||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| ORI | |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||
