RT Article
T1 On the structural conditions shaping implementation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ)-inclusive practices within intimate partner services in Australia
JF Journal of family violence
VO 40
IS 8
SP 1511
OP 1518
A1 Lim, Gene
A1 Lusby, Stephanie
A1 Carman, Marina
A1 Bourne, Adam
A2 Lusby, Stephanie
A2 Carman, Marina
A2 Bourne, Adam
LA English
YR 2025
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1946194468
AB Purpose: IPV constitutes a serious health concern for LGBTQ populations within Australia, yet inclusive service provision remains sparsely and unevenly accessible to victim-survivors. While poor availability and accessibility of inclusive services is widely recognized as an issue facing LGBTQ victim-survivors, few researchers have examined the structural or systemic basis of this problem. The current piece seeks to explore the structural conditions obstructing inclusive service provision to LGBTQ victim-survivors, from the perspective of service providers. Method: N = 19 interviews were conducted with N = 21 key personnel with affiliations to a variety of: (i) general population service organizations, (ii) community-led service organizations and (ii) advisory or convening groups. Interviews explored the structural conditions of the IPV service sector, focusing on barriers and enablers to implementing inclusive service provision for LGBTQ populations. Results: Three broad factors that obstructed or curtailed inclusive service implementation were identified. These were namely: (i) resistance from both internal and external sources around inclusive practice, (ii) accommodating keeping demands in resource constrained contexts, and (ii) political will and LGBTQ visibility within official policy. Responses to these challenges on the organizational level were sometimes sufficient to meaningfully - though only partially - ameliorate these factors, but seldom addressed the structural conditions that necessitate such responses. Conclusion: Inclusive service provision is a crucial element of victim-survivor recovery. The sporadic accessibility of such services within Australia can be attributed to several core features of sector and policy landscapes, which demand a significant degree of inter-organizational collaboration and collective advocacy to overcome.
NO Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 1517-1518
K1 Australia
K1 Intimate Partner Violence
K1 LGBTQ+
K1 Professionalized Services
DO 10.1007/s10896-023-00629-0