Prosecution strategy at the International Criminal Court in search of a theory
Alex Whiting thoroughly analyzes the submissions by the ICC Office of the Prosecutor and statements made by the Prosecution. He explains the different approaches of the first and the second Prosecutor: The first embraced a theory of ‘disruption and specific deterrence’, seeking to intervene in real...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2021
|
| In: |
Why punish perpetrators of mass atrocities?
Year: 2021, Pages: 285-304 |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1945152869 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20251209140636.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 251209s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108475143 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1945152869 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1945152869 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Whiting, Alex |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prosecution strategy at the International Criminal Court in search of a theory |c Alex Whiting |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Alex Whiting thoroughly analyzes the submissions by the ICC Office of the Prosecutor and statements made by the Prosecution. He explains the different approaches of the first and the second Prosecutor: The first embraced a theory of ‘disruption and specific deterrence’, seeking to intervene in real time to stop ongoing crimes with the Court being a force for diplomacy and peace. The second Prosecutor, on the other hand, focuses on the judicial tasks of the Court, chooses fewer cases, acts slowly and carefully. This way, the Court moved towards an expressive theory of punishment, investigations and cases are a way of expressing, shaping and enforcing norms. In the end, Whiting concludes that at the ICC’s Office of the Prosecutor theory does not dictate practice - it is the other way round: The Office’s strategy is reactive to and constrained by the dependency on state cooperation and the limits of the ICC’s authority. Only within those constraints, can theories of punishment play a role: ‘robust theories of punishment are a luxory of actors with power’. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a ICC | |
| 650 | 4 | |a prosecutorial policy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a statements on theories of punishment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a selection of cases and situations | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Why punish perpetrators of mass atrocities? |b First paperback edition |d Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2021 |g (2021), Seite 285-304 |h xviii, 392 Seiten |w (DE-627)1805530976 |z 9781108465892 |z 9781108475143 |7 nnam |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2021 |g pages:285-304 |
| 776 | 1 | |o 10.1017/9781108566360.020 | |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4824806828 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1945152869 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20251209140636 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 251209||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 09-12-25 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||
