Is international criminal law special?: a comment on the contributions by Frank Neubacher, Sergey Vasiliev and Elies van Sliedregt

Jochen Bung raises doubts as to the distinctiveness of international criminal law. In his view there is no need for specific theories of punishment in international criminal law or to develop specific criminological theories addressing international crimes. Instead, we can draw on what we know from...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Bung, Jochen 1968- (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Print Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2021
En: Why punish perpetrators of mass atrocities?
Año: 2021, Páginas: 129-134
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a2200000 c 4500
001 1945088850
003 DE-627
005 20251209101125.0
007 tu
008 251209s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
020 |a 9781108475143 
035 |a (DE-627)1945088850 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1945088850 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Bung, Jochen  |d 1968-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)136661408  |0 (DE-627)585453195  |0 (DE-576)179636693  |4 aut 
109 |a Bung, Jochen 1968- 
245 1 0 |a Is international criminal law special?  |b a comment on the contributions by Frank Neubacher, Sergey Vasiliev and Elies van Sliedregt  |c Jochen Bung 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Jochen Bung raises doubts as to the distinctiveness of international criminal law. In his view there is no need for specific theories of punishment in international criminal law or to develop specific criminological theories addressing international crimes. Instead, we can draw on what we know from the domestic context. While he agrees that there still is guessing and shadowboxing when it comes to the ‘why punish’ question in international criminal law, he notices that this is equally true when it comes to domestic theories of punishment. What is special though is that international criminal law emerged challenging the classic rules of state sovereignty and non-intervention. For him, this is where the discussion should start, and instead of asking ‘why punish’, we should raise questions such as, Will international criminal law vanish again? Should we hope it will vanish again? Has it helped to establish a collective memory which will prevent us from experiencing future mass atrocities? Is international criminal law a matter for experts and specialists? Is it sufficiently democratic? Is it a sufficiently universal affair? Or is it just another colonial strategy? Can it get less selective? And: Is international criminal law capable of self-criticism? 
650 4 |a distinctiveness of international criminal law 
650 4 |a domestic analogy 
650 4 |a piercing state sovereignty 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Why punish perpetrators of mass atrocities?  |b First paperback edition  |d Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2021  |g (2021), Seite 129-134  |h xviii, 392 Seiten  |w (DE-627)1805530976  |z 9781108465892  |z 9781108475143  |7 nnam 
773 1 8 |g year:2021  |g pages:129-134 
776 1 |o 10.1017/9781108566360.010 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4824650496 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1945088850 
LOK |0 005 20251209101125 
LOK |0 008 251209||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 939   |a 09-12-25  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw